Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 03:49
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Bacteria living in your gut may cause depression, not your brain, says a new study - Earth.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why am I more attracted to black men?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Circle’s buzzy IPO was a big hit. Now comes the hard part. - MarketWatch
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Three New Minerals Discovered in the Southwestern U.S. - Indian Defence Review
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why can't hot girls date ugly guys? I am ugly but I want an attractive girlfriend
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?